Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10982Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-22T05:52:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-01-22T05:52:03Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1922)ILR49CAL182 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/10982 | - |
| dc.description | Page No- 182-187 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.title | Billinghurst v. Meek | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |
| dc.case.name | Billinghurst v. Meek | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Teunon; Mr. Jusitce Suhrawardy JJ. | en_US |
| dc.date.judgement | 26-May-1921 | en_US |
| dc.volume.number | Volume 49 | en_US |
| dc.year.publication | 1922 | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Indian Law Reports : Calcutta (1922) Volume 49 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 019_Billinghurst v. Meek (182-187).pdf | 332.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
