Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25177Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-11T09:05:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-11T09:05:34Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1901)ILR23ALL213 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25177 | - |
| dc.description | Page No- 213-216 | - |
| dc.language.iso | English | - |
| dc.title | Reference under section 57 of Act No. II of 1899 | - |
| dc.type | Other | - |
| dc.case.name | Reference under section 57 of Act No. II of 1899 | - |
| dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Arthur Strachey ; Mr. Justice Banerji ; Mr. Justice Burkitt | - |
| dc.date.judgement | 9-Feb-1901 | - |
| dc.volume.number | Volume 23 | - |
| dc.year.publication | 1901 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Indian Law Reports : Allahabad (1901) Volume 23 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 052_Reference under section 57 of Act No. II of 1899 (213-216).pdf | 180.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
