Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29506
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-20T11:23:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-20T11:23:30Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | (1934)ILR56ALL750 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/29506 | - |
dc.description | Page No- 750-754 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Emperor v. Surajbali | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.case.name | Emperor v. Surajbali | en_US |
dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Bennet | en_US |
dc.date.judgement | 19-Dec-1933 | en_US |
dc.volume.number | Volume 56 | en_US |
dc.year.publication | 1934 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Indian Law Reports : Allahabad (1934) Volume 56 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
083_Emperor v. Surajbali (750-754).pdf | 205.12 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.