Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/35507
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T10:04:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T10:04:23Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | (1931)ILR9RANG165 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/35507 | - |
dc.description | Page No-165-169 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | C.K. Ummar v. C.K. Ali Ummar | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.case.name | C.K. Ummar v. C.K. Ali Ummar | en_US |
dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Sir Arthur Page, Kt | en_US |
dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Maung Ba | en_US |
dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Das | en_US |
dc.date.judgement | 23-Feb-1931 | en_US |
dc.volume.number | Volume 9 | en_US |
dc.year.publication | 1931 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Indian Law Reports : Rangoon (1931) Volume 09 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
034_C.K. Ummar v. C.K. Ali Ummar (165-169).pdf | 194.91 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.