1. "Indian Law Institute"
  2. Indian Law Reports
  3. Indian Law Reports Bombay (1876-1940)
  4. Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1893) Volume 17
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/39054
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-08T04:48:22Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-08T04:48:22Z-
dc.identifier.citation(1893)ILR17BOM723en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/39054-
dc.descriptionPage No-723-730en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleRaisett Chandmull Hamiemall and Another Plaintiffs v. Great Indian Peninsula Railway Company Defendantsen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.case.nameRaisett Chandmull Hamiemall and Another Plaintiffs v. Great Indian Peninsula Railway Company Defendantsen_US
dc.judge.nameMr. Justice Starlingen_US
dc.date.judgement25-Jul-1892en_US
dc.volume.number17en_US
dc.year.publication1893en_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1893) Volume 17

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
108_Raisett Chandmull Hamiemall and Another Plaintiffs v. Great Indian Peninsula Railway Company Defendants (723-730).pdf356.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.