1. "Indian Law Institute"
  2. Indian Law Reports
  3. Indian Law Reports Bombay (1876-1940)
  4. Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1898) Volume 22
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/39334
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-08T08:53:58Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-08T08:53:58Z-
dc.identifier.citation(1898)ILR22BOM54en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/39334-
dc.descriptionPage No-54-83en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleImperatrix v. Juma Bin Fakir and Urzee Bin Sullemanen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.case.nameImperatrix v. Juma Bin Fakir and Urzee Bin Sullemanen_US
dc.judge.nameMr. Justice Jardineen_US
dc.judge.nameMr. Justice Ranadeen_US
dc.date.judgement17-Mar-1896en_US
dc.volume.numberVolume 22en_US
dc.year.publication1898en_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1898) Volume 22

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
009_Imperatrix v. Juma Bin Fakir and Urzee Bin Sulleman (54-83).pdf1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.