Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/42116
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-09T04:12:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-09T04:12:30Z-
dc.identifier.citation(1930)ILR54BOM667en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/42116-
dc.descriptionPage No-667-696en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleBai Rukhiabai (Orignal Plaintiff No.1), Appellant v. Vadilal Puroshottamdas & Co. (Orignal Applicants), Respondentsen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.case.nameBai Rukhiabai (Orignal Plaintiff No.1), Appellant v. Vadilal Puroshottamdas & Co. (Orignal Applicants), Respondentsen_US
dc.judge.nameMr. Justice Amberson Marten, Kten_US
dc.judge.nameMr. Justice Blackwellen_US
dc.date.judgement2-Dec-1929en_US
dc.volume.number54en_US
dc.year.publication1930en_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1930) Volume 54



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.