1. "Indian Law Institute"
  2. Indian Law Reports
  3. Indian Law Reports Bombay (1876-1940)
  4. Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1940)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/42864
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T11:45:54Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-11T11:45:54Z-
dc.identifier.citationILR(1940)BOM127en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/42864-
dc.descriptionPage No-127-135en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.title"Atmaram Vinayak Kirtikar (Original Defendant), Applicant v. Lalji Lakhamsi and Others,Members of A Joint Undivided Hindu Family Doing Business In The Name of Co-Parcenary Firm of Lalji Lakhamsi At Mahim (Original Plaintiffs), Opponents "en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.case.name"Atmaram Vinayak Kirtikar (Original Defendant), Applicant v. Lalji Lakhamsi and Others,Members of A Joint Undivided Hindu Family Doing Business In The Name of Co-Parcenary Firm of Lalji Lakhamsi At Mahim (Original Plaintiffs), Opponents "en_US
dc.judge.nameMr.Justice John Beaumonten_US
dc.judge.nameMr.Justice Wassoodewen_US
dc.judge.nameMr.Justice Kaniaen_US
dc.date.judgement3-Oct-1939en_US
dc.year.publication1940en_US
Appears in Collections:Indian Law Reports : Bombay (1940)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
017_Atmaram Vinayak Kirtikar (Original Defendant), Applicant v. Lalji Lakhamsi and Others,Members of A Joint Undivided Hindu Family Doing Business In The Name of Co-Parcenary Firm of Lalji Lakham.pdf384.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.