Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/43685Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-13T10:08:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-13T10:08:20Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (1902)1CalLR940 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/43685 | - |
| dc.description | Page No- 940-947 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | Sham Koer V. Dah Koer and Rupan Koer V. Dah Koer.Two appeals consosidated. | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
| dc.case.name | Sham Koer V. Dah Koer and Rupan Koer V. Dah Koer.Two appeals consosidated. | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Justice Lords Macnaghten | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Lord Lindley | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Sir Ford North | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Sir Andrew Scoble | en_US |
| dc.judge.name | Sir Arthur Wilson. | en_US |
| dc.date.judgement | 30-Apr-1902 ; 5-Jun-1902 | en_US |
| dc.volume.number | 1 | en_US |
| dc.year.publication | 1902 | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Indian High Court Reports-Calcutta (1902) Volume 01 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0244_Sham Koer V. Dah Koer and Rupan Koer V. Dah Koer.Two appeals consosidated.(940-947).pdf | 636.77 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.