Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/48196Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Virendra | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-14T18:29:53Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-14T18:29:53Z | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | (2023)65JILI351 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0019-5731 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/48196 | - |
| dc.description | Page No 351-377 | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Indian Law Institute,New Delhi | en_US |
| dc.title | 28_Reservation for EWS under 103rd Constitutional Amendment via Basic Structure Doctrine of the Constitution - A critique of five-Judge Bench judgment of the Supreme Court in Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.volume.number | 65 | en_US |
| dc.year.publication | 2023 | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal of Indian Law Institute- Volume 65 (2023) | |
Files in This Item:
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
