Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9328
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-13T05:44:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-13T05:44:05Z | - |
dc.identifier.citation | (1908)ILR35CAL495 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/9328 | - |
dc.description | Page No- 495-518 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Barrow v. Hem Chunder Lahiri | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.case.name | Barrow v. Hem Chunder Lahiri | en_US |
dc.judge.name | Mr. Justice Francis William Maclean; K.C.I.E ; Mr. Justice Harington ; Mr. Justice Fletcher | en_US |
dc.date.judgement | 3-Jan-1908 | en_US |
dc.volume.number | Volume 35 | en_US |
dc.year.publication | 1908 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Indian Law Reports : Calcutta (1908) Volume 35 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
072_ Barrow v. Hem Chunder Lahiri (495-518).pdf | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.